Talk:Adding Support for New Raw Formats/de: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I assume that the explanations are not correct. In my opinion * support is not possible for new raw data formats, means a file format with new coding * support is possible for...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Status: open. Maybe reading of camconst.json make sense for me. | Status: open. Maybe reading of camconst.json make sense for me. | ||
--[[User:Fherb|fherb]] ([[User talk:Fherb|talk]]) 14:03, 27 March 2017 (MST) | --[[User:Fherb|fherb]] ([[User talk:Fherb|talk]]) 14:03, 27 March 2017 (MST) | ||
Other Question: | |||
"Some cameras scale raw values for larger apertures" | |||
What means "scale"? The camera multiply luminosity by a factor? | |||
--[[User:Fherb|fherb]] ([[User talk:Fherb|talk]]) 12:17, 28 March 2017 (MST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:17, 28 March 2017
I assume that the explanations are not correct. In my opinion
- support is not possible for new raw data formats, means a file format with new coding
- support is possible for new cameras or new sensors by using a known raw data format
- camconst.json can adjust the scaling of pixel values between a pixel is empty and full-well
- camconst.json can adjust color correction based on D65? (cross correction of the color channels)
Status: open. Maybe reading of camconst.json make sense for me. --fherb (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2017 (MST)
Other Question:
"Some cameras scale raw values for larger apertures"
What means "scale"? The camera multiply luminosity by a factor?